Is it better to defy your conscience and vote for a candidate you don't agree with or cast that same vote for a candidate that is not popular enough to ever win?
(I'm the Underdog and I approved this message.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
un·der·dog [uhn-der-dawg, -dog] – noun: a person who is expected to lose in a contest or conflict
About Me
- the Underdog
- Texas, United States
- I apologize in advance for all of the things that will be posted here. I am only partially responsible for the incoherent ramblings that spill out of my fingertips. I prefer pirates over ninjas. Protestants over Catholics. Peanut Butter over jelly. And I think brown eggs just taste better. This is my blog. Again.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(122)
-
▼
October
(21)
- Your thinking thoughts
- Be kind to toddlers
- Three things
- Tragic Flash Owee
- Fearsome
- Voting for Blue
- What I really want for my children....
- Random grab bag of fluff
- Elect Kermit the Frog
- Laughing funny unless you're a Dad
- Three things
- Churched: A book review
- If only every flight had a Marine
- The brilliance of true fellowship
- Hope in another Treasury
- Three things
- The infrequency of stillness
- I would like your input.
- Gives me the Heebie Jeebies
- Piper cometh
- Although today stinks...
-
▼
October
(21)
4 comments:
First off, is there a candidate you agree with? Totally?
No, I don't find that I have much in common with either of the candidates the primary parties have offered up. I don't find either ticket very appealing.
I picked an issue that is on my heart and decided to vote that issue.
So - I'm voting against the candidate that refuses health care for babies who survive abortions.
And then - another issue would be foreign policy -- I can't vote for the candidate that willingly, and against authority, went to visit the nut job in Iran...who is admittedly against my Country & Israel.
Probably doesn't help.
But -- there's not a candidate I totally agree with ...so I picked my issues.
Post a Comment